Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:59

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
O'Malley's dad 'super relaxed' cornering title bout - ESPN
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Popular Diabetes Drug Linked to Longer Life – Could It Help You Live Past 90? - SciTechDaily
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
The closer a volcano is to erupting, the greener the trees around it look from space - Live Science
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Deion Sanders is home in Texas dealing with an unspecified health issue - NBC Sports
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
How do I come out as queer to my best friend in a funny and stupid way?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Don't call it a rom-com: With wit and heart, "Materialists" transcends the tired form - Salon.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
The everyday activity that can reveal your brain’s age - BBC
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
How did you get to be a leftist?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years: